RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 02 2012,12:52   

PAV gets all sciency:

Quote
Well, Nick, if Ted Sargent–an established scientist, not a Creationist, not an IDist–is correct, then “melanism” as an example of neo-Darwinian mechanisms looks like it might be completely wrongheaded.

So, who’s guilty then of making “a complete incompetent hash of this story”, the IDists, or the evolutionists?


http://www.uncommondescent.com/evoluti....-429147

This is a rhetorical question, right?

Here's Ted Sargent
http://aslodge.tripod.com/id127.h....27.htm#

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]