rossum
Posts: 289
Joined: Dec. 2008
|
| Quote (Dr. Jammer @ June 21 2012,11:56) | The Darwinist must attempt to explain everythingrelated to the biological world, including human nature, via his creation myth. That's never been in doubt.
The question is, are those explanations convincing? |
The IDist must attempt to explain everythingrelated to the biological world, including the Designer, via his or her creation myth. That's never been in doubt.
The question is, firstly, do those explanations even exist, and secondly are those explanations convincing?
| Quote | | For the rest of us, we who aren't Darwin fundies, the explanations remain far less convincing. We require a much higher standard of evidence than do you religious folk. |
For the rest of us, we who aren't ID fundies, the explanations remain far less convincing. We require a much higher standard of evidence than do you religious folk.
Note here, that one of the ways to tell a content-free post is to take it and turn its arguments round to face the other way. If it works just as well in the opposite direction, then the original post was just content-free rhetoric with no real substance.
rossum
--------------
The ultimate truth is that there is no ultimate truth.
|
