JohnW
Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006
|
| Quote (Febble @ May 29 2012,09:53) | I made a transcript here:
http://theskepticalzone.com/wp....t....t-14178
I'm not sure why. I guess I was fascinated. I think it has its own internal logic actually. It just isn't premised on anything that is actually true. |
I made it as far as this paragraph:
| Quote | | The problem with Darwinism is that it is a cultural mood. It’s not really a theory in science, if you look at the actual science literature, what’s available to show Darwinism is negligible, piddling, the major claims are not met. Increasingly the publicity for the science papers that drift through my mailbox are more and more nonsensical, ever more frantic efforts to explain how human compassion, for example, is really a selfish thing. No really! Because evolution really always means Darwinism. In American terms. The writer of the paper, the article advertising the paper, need to explain it in Darwinian terms. As Giberson did, one of the theologians mentioned here. It’s really that you were selected for selfishness. Now then how on earth you ever knew about compassion, I don’t know. I was genetically selected for blue eyes. I know there are brown eyes because I’ve observed them, but I can’t do it. That’s real genetic selection. Not the nonsense that Giberson and the others were talking about. |
... and had to stop before I poked my own eyes out.
--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers
There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"... Â The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG
|
