eigenstate
Posts: 78 Joined: Nov. 2011
|
ScottAndrews2 should be credited with showing some courage and clear thinking here:
Quote | It’s been fun, but I’m not comfortable with this. While I agree that it’s absurd to argue that the moon can exist and not exist, I’m not comfortable debating someone if they are required to humiliate themselves by repeating a one-word answer. I understand the reason, but it feels too much like submission, like staring a dog in the eyes until it looks down. But I’ll keep reading all the excellent posts and comments.
Quote | Can the moon exist and not exist at the same time and in the same formal relation? |
Yes.
|
I take it he is answering Yes because that's what he really thinks, not because he has been put in a vice by a blog admin.
But he gets to a basic problem for Barry's behavior. I didn't expect to see anything like this come up (ben h deserves some knucks for pushing back, too -- he's just new enough that I'm not sure where he's coming from... could be a sock, etc.) from the pro-ID regulars.
OnEdit: JohnW beat me to the punch on SA2, I see
Edited by eigenstate on Feb. 14 2012,16:15
|