oldmanintheskydidntdoit
Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006
|
Gordo, the coward, says:
| Quote | | I shudder to think of how this and other exchanges are being misrepresented elsewhere, where we are not there to correct. Which comes right back to the issue of live donkeys and safely dead lions. |
Whose choice is it that you are not here to "correct" what needs to be corrected?
Just wow.
Eventually, after a series of comments where he says nothing new, he producs his "evidence".
| Quote | The only empirically warranted source for complex, functionally specific organisation, is design. And, that outlined analysis of the supertask implied for blind forces is a part of why that is so. (BTW, the vproblem is closely analogous to the challenge of doing your post by random typing. That does not imply that only your post is a possible functionally specific, complex outcome — so is mine — but it does underscore what you are ever so eager to ignore: both of these posts are FSCI, and are cases E from a relatively narrow set of contextually responsive posts, T in the set of possible strings of appropriate length, W. By far and away most would be gibberish, and the resources of the observed cosmos would be fruitlessly challenged to get to ANY member E1, E2, . . . of T, within the resources of the observed cosmos, by blind chance and mechanical necessity. Islands of function in vast seas of non-function, as is typical of such things. But, if one is committed to not seeing what is exemplified all around us . . . )
Later, we can look at the further cases, but it is already plain that this is another strawman being kicked over.
GEM of TKI |
What do you mean "look at further cases"? You've not looked at a single one yet!
"This post has FSCI in it, but I can't tell you how much but just trust me".
--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings
|
