Kattarina98
Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009
|
The Tard is strong in this thread.
Massive circle jerk among true believers™:
tjguy starts the dance, explaining why creationism must not have a theory at all: | Quote | | It takes a good bit of hubris for us to reject what He has told us and come up with our own theories about how He did it as well. |
APM thinks biology is about
Mytheos dares to have an idea about how God created life, nevertheless: | Quote | Ive thought that he may have used his own DNA and tweaked it for each kind of creature.
That would also explain similar traits in life. |
tjguy loves it: | Quote | | That sounds very reasonable. |
MrDunsapy muses about implementation: | Quote | The bible has always been ahead of the scientists.
I think this also explains why scientists are seeing histories of previous kinds of animals. Also creation by breeding would also be an option. Just as man has created a Poodle. |
and a bit further down he proudly announces: | Quote | | I came up with these ideas a while back and have been testing it out. |
"Information is not enough":
gpuccio spots a likeminded soul:
| Quote | Welcome in the very small group of neovitalists! (I am always looking for company…) :)
...
Even if information alone is not enough to ensure life, there is no doubt that information is necessary.
...
So, the design argument is completely valid. The step from information to life remains a possible further issue, at least for us neovitalists! :) |
Should we tell him to contact Atheistoclast who trolls over at PT? And as three's company, why not form a group and start a schisma?
--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.
|
