Kristine
Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006
|
| Quote (Richardthughes @ Dec. 11 2011,09:15) | | Quote (Woodbine @ Dec. 11 2011,06:40) | Happily, Mullings is having conniptions.
He is now accusing Dawkins and the whole Gnu Atheists of 'implicit anti-semitism', both at UD and his own inert blog.
Kairostard
| Quote | | So, Dr Dawkins and co, kindly note: the direct implication of these anti-God, anti-Bible arguments, is that they are implicit attacks on Jews and Judaism, not just Christians and Christianity. Those who would make them, need to ask whether they would be willing to explicitly substitute terms directly accusing or challenging Jews, for those that accuse or challenge Christians. |
I think the trick with trolling Mullings is in eliciting the greatest amount of textual garbage for the least amount of prodding. And it's a comfort to know he's stuck behind his keyboard vomiting ream upon ream of multicoloured, bullet-pointed shite and not at large in the world. Job done.
 |
His ad hominem soaked straw-man crocodile death roll trifecta red herring nuclear tripwire will surely be...
...completely unnoticed by them. |
Too bad that Christopher Hitchens is ill, or he would be all over this like the dust on ID research. And if any UDzombie were to include him as an anti-Semite, they would be buried under the piles of Hitchens' Vanity Fair articles on the subject.
Incidentally, newsflash to UD and to Newt Gringrich: expelled ID "researchers" are an invented people!
--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?
AtBC Poet Laureate
"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive
"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr
|
