damitall
Posts: 331
Joined: Jan. 2009
|
Not one of them has produced - or even could produce - any example of Dr. Liddle being "intellectually dishonest"
In their increasingly barmy world- and I mean that "increasingly" - simple disagreement and/or insistence on proper definition of terms to be used in a discussion constitute "intellectual dishonesty"
I'm pretty certain that none of them could actually define "intellectual dishonesty" - which is rather ironic.
Me, I'm a bit of a softie. I'm beginning to feel a little guilty about laughing at the poor saps. It's what my dear ol' mum used to call "mocking the afflicted"
But I'll get over it.
|
