RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Patrick



Posts: 666
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 14 2011,09:13   

Joseph is reduced to mere sputtering, even more blatantly than usual:
Quote
No one said every change has to be designed. ID does not exclude darwinian mechanisms and it does not exclude random effects.

Also the hypotheses have nothing to do with blind and undirected chemical processes and again ID is not anti-evolution.

So ID isn't anti-evolution, it doesn't exclude anything, and it doesn't entail anything.  What exactly is your point, then?

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]