JLT
Posts: 740
Joined: Jan. 2008
|
| Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 01 2011,21:19) | Darwin still failing at UD:
| Quote | Next: 2006: Dissent from Darwin is becoming more open among professionals
All posts in this series:
2006: Dissent from Darwin is becoming more open among professionals
2007: Darwinist efforts to stifle the ID community are failing
2008: Lots of people doubt Darwin that you didn’t think would, and are not afraid to say so
2009: The modern (neo-Darwinian) synthesis is – safely – admitted to be fading
2010: Layer on layer of intricacy outstrips Darwinian just-so stories
http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwini....e-years
|
http://chem.tufts.edu/Answers....se.html |
2007:
| Quote | | Quote | The top intelligent design book honors for 2007 goes to Michael Behe’s Edge of Evolution [bla bla bla]
The “edge” of evolution, a line that defines the border between random and non-random mutation, lies very far from where Darwin pointed. Behe argues convincingly that most of the mutations that have defined the history of life on earth have been non-random.
|
Most Darwinist response is ill-informed attacks and cries of “Darwindunit!” when it was plentifully obvious that Darwin didn’t do it. |
--------------
"Random mutations, if they are truly random, will affect, and potentially damage, any aspect of the organism, [...]
Thus, a realistic [computer] simulation [of evolution] would allow the program, OS, and hardware to be affected in a random fashion." GilDodgen, Frilly shirt owner
|
