Occam's Aftershave
Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006
|
More ID brilliance from Chubs over at his place:
| Quote | | Joe G: Let's see- ID is the detection and study of intelligent design in nature. Contrasted with post-ID research that deals with the who, how, when, where, why and everything else that follows from the first. |
| Quote | Ghostrider: How do the questions
Who did the Intelligent Design?
How was the Intelligent Design done?
When was the Intelligent Design done?
Where was the Intelligent Design done?
Why was the Intelligent Design done?
...not have anything to do with Intelligent Design? |
| Quote | | Joe G: They are separate questions from what ID asks, just as Dembski wrote. How do those questions have anything to do with the detection and study of intelligent design in nature? Do we have to have those answers before we cam determine intelligent design exists? No, we do not. |
| Quote | | Ghostrider: You say ID is about the detection AND STUDY of design in nature. How do those five questions above not qualify as a STUDY of the design? |
| Quote | | Joe G: Make your case, coward. How will studying the design help us identify the designer? |
Emphasis mine. Chubs is the gift that keeps on giving. 
--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."
- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.
|
