prong_hunter
Posts: 45
Joined: May 2010
|
Did you read the rejection letter Atheistoclast received from Evolutionary Biology on Panda's Thumb?
No wonder he is so bitter. He is reduced to arguing his 'points' on Internet fora, instead of in peer-reviewed journals. Why? Because his 'points' won't pass peer-reviewed muster.
His arguments are just like his thesis: "No New Information!"
His argument/point/thesis adds "no new information" to the discussion of Evolution, Science, or anything.
Irony, no?
Pathetic, yes.
|
