Joined: May 2006
Yes, brilliant, just like the Galileo gambit that they and every other pseudoscientist has brought up.
What have they ever done but produce very inexact analogies that fail at the facts every time?
Let's see, Wegener's idea explained the fit of continents and fossil distributions (related to the fact that evolutionary theory tells us that exact duplicates can't be replicated after extinction, not the case for design--gee, how does that turn out, in fact?), while IDiocy explains, uh, what the IDiots want it to explain--while every inconvenient fact that evolution predicts and is found is ignored by these dishonest cretins.
Did plate tectonics win by whining that it doesn't stoop to geologists' pathetic level of detail?
Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy