Joe G
Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007
|
| Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 04 2018,09:57) | | Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 04 2018,17:48) | | Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 04 2018,09:44) | | Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 04 2018,17:16) | | Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 03 2018,23:37) | | Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 04 2018,05:28) | | Quote (Tony M Nyphot @ Jan. 03 2018,20:11) | As to another of your primary claims, that of "ice is not water", perhaps you could get up to speed with a grade school physics lesson at the following link:
Again, as the ridiculousness of your initial claim became apparent, you added the "context" of solid versus liquid.
Which doesn't change the fact that both the liquid (water in your "context") and the solid (ice in your "context") are composed of...water.
You're wrong and once again too much of a coward to admit it. |
Context is always important, dipshit. And, to top it off, in the thread on my blog that started this huge evoTARDgasm I said that I used a poor choice of words in order to try to make my point. But no, you jerkoffs had to throw your usual ignorant stunts, ignore the context, ignore all attempts at an explanation and ignore the fact that what you have been seeking was already provided.
But it's OK as you have been entertaining. |
No Joe there has never been a "context" where frequency and wavelength are interchangeable.
What you don't know and can only get a faint grasp of is that when an Amateur radio guy wants to cut an antenna to it's resonant frequency he must CONVERT frequency to wavelength by using the the general wave formula velocity=lamda/period to determine the length of the antenna.
What is Lamda?
If they were interchangeable (gaffaw) there would be no need for CONVERSION based on the speed of light in this case.
What you propose breaks Einstein's Theory of Relativity which relies on the speed of light being constant (in any given medium).
But then you can't know that can you?
Why?
Answer: JOE IS A TARD. |
I provided a context in which frequency and wavelength are interchangeable, Davey. That you are too ignorant to understand it is your problem, not mine. |
No Joe tard, you haven't provided a "context" or a method or a process or reason where frequency and wavelength are "interchangeable" what you have provided is mere superficial hand waving with no explanation. |
Your willful ignorance is neither and argument nor a refutation.
This page shows tghey are interchangeable in a specific context. That is what the dash means:
2200 meters – 135.7–137.8 kHz
630 meters – 472–479 kHz
And if you follow the links there you will read:
160 meters refers to the band of radio frequencies between 1800 and 2000 kHz
That is what INTERCHANGEABLE means |
Joe you are talking out of your ass. A "band of wavelengths" refers to a portion of the electromagnetic spectrum as a general classification as quick reference not a specific frequency. |
Davey, you are a willfully ignorant ass.
--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth
"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton
Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code- Acartia bogart, TARD
YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism
|
