OgreMkV
Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009
|
Yes, Joe, you said it way over there 7 pages ago. And you haven't mentioned it since.
You are right context is very important... and you're ignoring it and therefore making incorrect statements.
I'd love see you submit a paper that says "wavelength = frequency" and then, but I explained the context on a forum. LOL.
The statement you made in bold is true ONLY under a constant velocity. But you didn't say that. For all the grief you give me about context, it's fun to remind you that it works both ways.
Speak clearly and communicate carefully or you'll look like an idiot... more like an idiot.
BTW: wavelength = frequency is STILL wrong and will always be wrong under every possible condition. And there's STILL NO 1:1 correspondence between wavelength and frequency.
--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.
http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat
|
