Joe G
Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007
|
| Quote (OgreMkV @ Oct. 22 2014,09:11) | | Quote (Joe G @ Oct. 22 2014,07:50) | | Quote (rossum @ Oct. 22 2014,07:08) | | Quote (Joe G @ Oct. 22 2014,06:14) | | Can you walk us through some of the testable hypotheses for differing accumulations of genetic accidents, ie neo-darwinian evolution? |
For a good illustration of differential accumulation of 'genetic accidents' google for the Luria-Delbrück experiment.
| Quote | | Science does have a great track record. However NDE doesn't qualify as science. |
It does and it does, respectively.
rossum |
Please provide the methodology that determined the changes were differential accumulation of 'genetic accidents'.
And in what way is NDE science? It doesn't make any predictions based on the mechanisms and it is untestable. |
1) Darwinian Evolution on a chip
2) Tiktaalik |
Yes Kevin, we all know that you are an equivocator.
Please tell us how it was determined that Tiktaalik arose by differing accumulations of genetic accidents/ errors/ mistakes.
Or just admit that you are an ignorant fuck
--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth
"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton
Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code- Acartia bogart, TARD
YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism
|
