OgreMkV
Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009
|
| Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 15 2013,08:43) | And Kevin, your ignorant article on natural selection is a hoot. Natural selection is blind and mindless. So you would need to have a blind and mindless person selecting the dice from the shoebox.
The point is that you don't know anything about the theory of evolution and you think your ignorance means something.
Again Richard Dawkins said evolution is the blind watchmaker, not me. Jerry Coyne agrees with him. They are the high priests of evolutionism. OTOH YOU are an ignorant nobody. |
blah blah blah...
Isn't it funny how you ignore all the things Dawkins and Coyne and all the other actual biologists say EXCEPT when they say something that you think supports your point of view.
Isn't it funny how how you don't realize that something that is mindless can create an exceedingly complex system.
Isn't it funny how you think aggression and yelling are better than actual evidence.
I notice that you don't refute the fact that your entire line of evidence is "No way".
In other words, Joe, you know you don't have shit and are just attacking to try and get away from it. Joe, we've been talking for almost four years. Don't you know that every single person here knows when you don't have shit? Every single time you get called out on not having any evidence you switch from 'evidence of ID' to 'attacking evolution' mode.
It's really funny. I'm not even sure if you are doing it consciously or unconsciously. But it happens every single time. Go ahead, actually learn something for once. Read this entire thread from start to finish. Every time one of us demands evidence, look at what you say and do. It's exactly as I have described.
You don't have any evidence. You know it (at least sub-consciously), but you are so invested in your world-view that you can't admit it. It's really sad.
--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.
http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat
|
