OgreMkV
Posts: 3668 Joined: Oct. 2009
|
Once again, Joe, for the 1000th time. You are the only one who believes in 'blind watchmaker / totally random' evolution.
Two, there is no actual evidence to support ID in those claims.
Here's what you are saying...
"The moon orbits the Earth. That's evidence that all astronomical bodies orbit the Earth."
This is your entire body of evidence Joe.
Quote | Highly effiecient, irreducibly complex, and no way- physiochemcially to get the two subunits to come together-> there's no attraction and no coupling. |
Yep, that's it "No way this can happen".
You do realize that the authors of the ATP paper don't agree with you, right?
You do realize that jumping to unwarranted conclusions is what you constantly yell at us for, right?
Here Joe: http://www.life.illinois.edu/crofts....F1.html
Yes, it's somewhat speculative, but at least science can actually look at the problem, conceive of a method to explore various solutions and examine them. You, 'design' that's all.
More of the same. Haven't done anything new in years.
-------------- Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.
http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat
|