Joined: July 2007
|Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 25 2010,19:29)|
|Textbooks don't have any before-the-fact specifications Joe. They have descriptions of the makeup of proteins that were determined by after-the-fact observations.|
You need to show where the specifications were listed first, and then confirmed by observation. Otherwise you're just doing the 'sharpshooter's fallacy' - shooting an arrow anywhere into the side of the barn, then drawing the target around it afterward and claiming a bulls-eye.
Where are the before-the-fact specifications Joe?
Umm the theory of evolution is based on after-the-fact observation.
Science is an after-the-fact enterprise- you have to make an observation and THEN you formulate a hypothesis- after-the-fact.
But anyway Dr Behe discusses this in "Darwin's Black Box":
|"Our ability to be confident of the design of the cilium or intracellular transport rests on the same principles to be confident of the design of anything: the ordering of separate components to achieve an identifiable function that depends sharply on the components.”|
That said what does your position have asshole?
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t
simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims. (don't know why Ogre has that, but it fits IDists)