RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (12) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: The limits of darwinism., Utunumsint's thread.< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Utunumsint



Posts: 103
Joined: Jan. 2010

(Permalink) Posted: April 06 2010,12:49   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ April 06 2010,12:42)
Quote (Utunumsint @ April 06 2010,11:29)
But I'm still having problems imagining the evulutionary path to such complex organisms as the flagellum.

From what?

Well that's just the point. If there are 30 missing homologes(?), and the closest relative to the fully functioning flagella has only 10, then you have to explain the jump.

What midwife's post affirms is that Minnich was dead wrong about this fact, and correspondingly, so was Behe. All the functions of the flagella could have been coopted.

Cheers,
Ut

  
  333 replies since Jan. 28 2010,12:18 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (12) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]