deadman_932
Posts: 3094
Joined: May 2006
|
| Quote (deadman_932 @ Sep. 23 2009,12:50) | Just as a point of information:
Floyd Lee's current tactic is to pretend his "Big Five " have not been addressed.
This is coupled with his avoiding answering those points raised against his claims (so he can pretend those responses don't exist).
In doing so, Floyd Lee has abandoned his own agreement to engage in good-faith debate.
As I stated to Floyd Lee prior to starting this thread;
" debate is dialogue, not monologue, and that civility (well, to a decent, ethical person) would require *directly* addressing the points of your opponent ...
fail to adhere to good-faith discussion/debate standards and all “rules” go out the window. Your choices determine that.
Floyd Lee's own choices have determined that other posters are no longer obliged to treat Floyd Lee as anything more than a fraud willing to go back on his word -- a fanatic without ethics or honor.
It appears that's exactly what he wants to be able to claim "persecution" and "victory" based on emotional appeal rather than the strength of his argument and logic (since he has none of the latter).
Myself, I find mockery of his stupidity, dishonesty, childlike views and blatantly false claims is enough. Others can do as they wish, of course. There are no longer any special rules to this thread. Floyd Lee has seen to that. |
Just to repeat this , for convenience
--------------
AtBC Award for Thoroughness in the Face of Creationism
|
