deadman_932
Posts: 3094
Joined: May 2006
|
| Quote (FloydLee @ Sep. 22 2009,10:09) |
So far, none of the evolutionist statements I've quoted WRT the Big Five, have been cherry-picked or quote- mined.
Each person quoted has meant exactly what he or she said on each point for which they were quoted WRT the Big Five.
Nobody in this forum has come up with an extended quotation that contradicted the point expressed in the original quotation that I supplied. Your felow evolutionists, authors, professors, are quite serious about what they are saying here. They're not backing down one bit. |
Dawkins can say what he pleases regarding Dawkin's beliefs about the limits of Gods, as can others. They are not "spokesmen" for all science, and it's a fallacy to claim they are, as you've done.
Their words on that matter hold no weight in regard to how science is conducted, and it's science which you have a problem with...all of science, not just evolution. Remember what I wrote just above?
| Quote | "If I were to cherry-pick some claims by various scientists in Physics or Chemistry, or Biology, or Astronomy, I have no doubt at all that I could find some that say "My field 'X' doesn't require that we ascribe orgins to Yahweh."
Floyd Lee's "logic" says a Real Christian must reject things like astronomy if SOME astronomers in it have made claims about "no God needed"
That's all he's offered about evolution --- cherry-picked quotes that run contrary to his "big 4 ." Well, as I said, all the major fields of science (and humanities and arts) include some statements by some practitioners to that effect. |
So...howsabout that Pope Benedict? Christian or not?
Another thing, are you a literalist on all the commandments in the bible?
When's the last time you had a crab or shrimp dinner?
--------------
AtBC Award for Thoroughness in the Face of Creationism
|
