OgreMkV
Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009
|
| Quote (Robin @ April 14 2010,09:37) | [quote=FloydLee,April 13 2010,17:12][/quote]
| Quote | | If Dembski's specific 3-point hypothesis survives the falsification process, |
LOL! Sorry FL, but unless Dembski publishes his "hypothesis" under the guidelines of the Scientific Method - which would include an actual scientific body for peer review - it won't be taken seriously or accepted as science. Dembski refuses to actually treat his "work" scientifically, preferring instead to publish it as popular philosophy in book form to general audiences. That's up to him of course - I don't begrudge the man making a buck or two off the rubes. But the fact is, right now nothing from ID has entered any scientific process, never mind falsification specifically, because Demski has chosen not to go that route. |
I think the actual statement from Dembski was "[we don't need that] pathetic level of detail"
Makes one wonder what level of detail is required...
--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.
http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat
|
