Scienthuse
Posts: 43
Joined: Sep. 2009
|
| Quote (deadman_932 @ Oct. 08 2009,20:27) | There's a lot of candidates for dumbass statements in Clownshoes' posts. First he says the Redwall isn't 95% pure, then he says YES, it's pure, but science cannot explain it, ZOMG!!11!. Then he posts up his "research" that is 182 words of his own. Yay,
Me, I think this is the funniest part of his post:
"If you research you will find that crinoid heads decay very quickly."
Wow. Time-travel machine? Secret extinct-crinoid farm in Atlantis? Aliens in his head whispering arcane secrets? Extrapolation from modern crinoids? Will we ever know?
P.S. Clownshoes : Great. A localized event that accounts for 6 feet of material in a formation that averages ... what, about 450 feet in thickness, on average? WATERLOO!!! Oh, I feel faint. I concede your mighty victory, Clownshoes ; clearly, you have overturned all of evilushuns!! |
Deadman,
Purity...purity...purity.
You do the same thing you say I do--don't pay attention! Why don't you just explain why it is so pure and quit your QUIBBLING??
Extrapolation? Did you forget--"the present is the key to the past?" I mean it's your mantra.
Nautiloids with "...implosion structures and collapse of the body cavity..." shows catastrophic deposition.
Six feet--times "[15,000] km2" A nautiloid per m2--15% of the population vertical=mass kill.
And the 95% purity issue. The fact is you can't account for it. You established the fact so now I would be happy to know why it's pure without indication of seafloor material.
|
