Freddie
Posts: 371
Joined: Oct. 2009
|
Batshit77
| Quote | | Elizabeth, when you actually make a coherent argument backed by solid empirics, then you will earn my respect that you are posting in good faith, and not before. |
Yeah,,,, Elizabeth,,,, why is it that you never spam up every thread on UD by posting a hundred links to batshit insane crazy whack job web sites that 99.9% of readers will just scroll past as fast as they possibly can ,,,, ???? Perhaps then you'll earn my damn respect too!!!!1!
More seriously, I had to look up what empirics meant and definition 1 (of empiric, actually) appears to have the noun variant as someone who uses empirical methods, which I had guessed was the intended usage.
Definition 2 (adj.) is interesting as well:
| Quote |
2. (Medicine) a medical quack; charlatan ... An unqualified or dishonest practitioner;
|
Just saying ,,,,
--------------
Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy.
Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people.
Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.
|
