lkeithlu
Posts: 321
Joined: Feb. 2006
|
| Quote (Hermagoras @ April 15 2011,16:23) | | Quote (lkeithlu @ April 15 2011,15:00) | Still trying to get an answer, and to get my posts through moderation:
293
KL
04/15/2011
8:11 am
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Given the experience I, JR, Indium, mathgrrl and others are having on this thread trying to get regulars here to answer to claims made, it is becoming clear to me that this site is all hat and no cattle. I have been asked questions without being given a straight answer for my original question, answering the original claims of the thread, which is:
If you say that the work of anthropologists in coming up with explanations for the features, ages and distributions of the hominid fossils are misguided, incorrect, even delusional, what is YOUR explanation of these details using YOUR paradigm in place of evolution? The only fossil mentioned has been Lucy, but she is one of hundreds, and Lucy is described in the context of the other fossils, their locations, features and relative ages. Metaphysical explanations, Bible and Plato quotes, and computer analogies don’t count. And, simply saying “intelligent design” is not an explanation.
For onlookers that (finally) see this post, you should know that it is being submitted at 9:10 AM CDT, as it will appear in the order it was received but will not show up for hours, the selective moderation policy being another piece of evidence to the dishonesty of this site.
Moderation now almost 6 hours. |
As I understand it, QuiteID also seems to have been silently banninated. He'd appreciate it if you could mention that too. |
Well, 12 hours in moderation now-could it be that I too have been silently "banned"?
|
