OgreMkV
Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009
|
Here's the problem with all that. Even if there was a viable, calculatable definition for CSI and/or design, there isn't a metric.
What values indicate design and what values indicate non-design?
Even if you assume something is designed, why can't evolution be the mechanism of design?
There is no reason why not. So, no matter what tack you take, ID ends up with nothing. Heck, even if ID were 100% correct, it would still be useless to the everyday business of biology.
The only method that ID has that could possibly bear any fruit would be to find the designer and since that is specifically forbidden hidden by ID proponents, there is nothing that they can do, even in theory, to promote their notions.
--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.
http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat
|
