Erasmus, FCD
Posts: 6349 Joined: June 2007
|
Bruce David is either a liar, google-challenged, or new to UD
Quote | 52 Bruce David 03/21/2011 1:52 pm Dr. Moran, you said, “Don’t pretend that my side is the only side enjoying that kind of debate. It damages your credibility.”
I think, if you’ll read the books, articles, and blogs by the proponents I mentioned in my first comment (Behe, Dembski, Wells, etc.), and if you watch their public interviews and debates, you will find that without exception, their arguments are based entirely on the scientific issues and that they do not stoop to “enjoying that kind of debate”. In fact, in my opinion they are remarkably restrained, considering the ad hominem abuse that is heaped upon them by the likes of Coyne, Dawkins, and Myers (and apparently you as well).
|
<farts>
are you fucking kidding me? i have yet to hear one of these amateur street thespians even mention anything about science, outside of their wishing out loud
-------------- You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK
Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG
the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat
I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles
|