Maya
Posts: 702
Joined: Dec. 2007
|
| Quote (JAM @ Nov. 07 2010,12:23) | | Quote (Maya @ Nov. 07 2010,07:37) | | I'm sure other people here have noticed this before, but I just recently realized how profoundly ignorant the IDiots are of the sheer volume of peer-reviewed papers that come out in only a single month. |
Might it be better (and much less effort) if whenever they cite a paper (usually via the press release), we ask:
1) If these data represent ID passing an empirical test of an ID hypothesis, why weren't these experiments done at the Biologic Institute or by another ID proponent?
2) If these data represent ID passing an empirical test of an ID hypothesis, what are the followup experiments (and their empirical predictions) that should be performed next?
3) Why aren't any of the authors of these papers joining your side if they represent evidence favoring ID over modern evolutionary theory?
4) If these results support ID, aren't the leaders of the ID movement being lazy when they don't do anything empirical? |
Those are really questions for Clivebaby. Fortunately he's known to lurk here.
How about it, Clive, you disingenuous cowardly bitch -- why do you ban people for asking questions like that? Oh, wait, I answered my own question!
|
