Ptaylor
Posts: 1180 Joined: Aug. 2006
|
Quote (Kattarina98 @ Oct. 26 2010,04:51) | So, previous ideas always beat more recent ones? They describe reality better because ...? |
Ooh, ooh, I can help here! Here's the logic, courtesy of tragic mishap from just over a year ago: Quote | <snip a few paragraphs> As a YEC, I never really believed the only reason or even the biggest reason for that view is to preserve this classical theology. In fact, I cant really recall that ever entering my thinking. Others might think that way, but I assure you I do not. My own reason is quite simply that when asking a historical question, the oldest accounts are quite literally the closest to the truth. It seems rather arrogant to me to trust the modern interpretations of the evidence rather than to trust the accounts of people who were much closer to the actual events than we were. Especially considering the ridiculous level of error in modern science in relation to truth in the absolute sense. |
-------------- We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.” -PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016
|