oldmanintheskydidntdoit
Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006
|
Salvador to Clive: | Quote | | Thank you for taking care of Hans. I just read some of his comments in the spam buffer and they smack of Bigotry. |
Is that right Salvador? Let's have a look then. Quoted text
| Quote | bornagain
Hans, I have far better things to do than to try to reason with someone who would rather win a point in a argument
No, you have not. Tried to reason with me that is. Block posting links and text is not an attempt to reason, rather I see it as an attempt to bluff. And when I call it, by asking a simple question you must know the answer to if you really understand what you post, you bail.
Bye then.
|
Or perhaps this?
| Quote | William
I guess it depends on what you mean by “scientifically literate”.
Do you mean “in agreement with consensus conclusions”?
Is that what scientifically literate means to you? As has already been pointed out science develops by people breaking out of consensus positions.
So no, that's not how I define it.
I think that the term “scientifically literate”, like whether or not one is a “real scientist”, is mostly just a means of trying to establish or undermine credibility.
Do you hold that the YEC view is credible? That's one way of assessing scientific literacy if you ask me. The age of the earth comes from mutiple lines of evidence. By all means work to determine the truth of the matter, but do you really think we're going to discover the earth is 6000 years old next year? The year after?
In the same way we're not going to discover that water flows uphill, we're not going to discover the earth is 6000 years old.
|
Or perhaps this
| Quote | bornagain
the truth is that the definitive boundary to space/time matter/energy goes a few hundred thousand years earlier before the CMBR
How far away is that from us?
And it seens you've been channeling Derek Paravicini and passing off his work as your own comments.
I maintain that 4-D space-time is grossly insufficient to maintain such 3-D symmetry from radically different points of observation in the universe
You might maintain it, but you did not write it I think. |
It's funny but up to the moment Clive came in like the buffoon he is and banned poor Hans, everybody was happy to talk to him Salvador included.
There was also another comment poking fun at Sal for not being able to come up with a single atheist who believes the earth is 6000 years old, but I can't recover that. Perhaps you should post it yourself Sal?
Prove your case to everybody.
--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings
|
