didymos
Posts: 1828
Joined: Mar. 2008
|
In a comment in the Gordonian mode (complete with idiosyncratic bolding, numbered points and sub-points, and notes), Vjtorley wraps up with: | Quote |
I really do believe that Einstein is no greater, better, more valuable or more important than a so-called “cretin” or “moron.” I suspect that Darwinists do not share this belief. As far as I can tell, they are intellectual snobs. They appear to regard intellectually impaired people (at least, some of them) as morally inferior and less valuable. Come on, ‘fess up. You do, don’t you, Darwinists?
So criticize me if you like, Mr. Nakashima, but don’t saw off the ethical branch you’re sitting on.
|
No, Vj, I don't. Well, unless they're a UD regular, like, for instance, you. Asshole.
--------------
I wouldn't be bothered reading about the selfish gene because it has never been identified. -- Denyse O'Leary, professional moron
Again "how much". I don't think that's a good way to be quantitative.-- gpuccio
|
