Wesley R. Elsberry
Posts: 4991
Joined: May 2002
|
As demonstrated in the two runs I did comparing the output of v1.2.1 and v1.4.1 on the very same configuration, v1.2.1 has a major error in its handling of beneficial mutations. This has nothing at all to do with memory limits; I also ran both with the default case, and the experimental case used in both merely changed the two parameters as specified by Zachriel above. The memory usage was under 130MB for all cases I ran; the memory I had was sufficient and the simulations ran to completion. Sanford either was given a garbled account of the issue or is deploying a meaningless digression as a response.
ETfix: 130,000KB = 130MB
Edited by Wesley R. Elsberry on June 12 2009,11:19
--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker
|
