Antievolution.org - Antievolution.org Discussion Board -Topic::Daniel Smith's "Argument from Impossibility"

	Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Daniel Smith's "Argument from Impossibility"

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >

Topic: Daniel Smith's "Argument from Impossibility", in which assumptions are facts

< Next Oldest | Next Newest >

Henry J

Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink)

Posted: April 20 2009,22:07

Never mind asking for examples, just find out how pointing to unanswered questions is supposed to somehow undermine a hypothesis.

I would have thought that to show that something contradicts a hypothesis, one would have to address something that the hypothesis had already been used to address.

Somehow I don't see unanswered questions as being in that category.

Maybe that's just me?

Henry

1103 replies since Jan. 26 2009,15:45

< Next Oldest | Next Newest >

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >


Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]