RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Daniel Smith's "Argument from Impossibility", in which assumptions are facts< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
rhmc



Posts: 340
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 13 2009,19:02   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ April 13 2009,19:19)
Quote (rhmc @ April 11 2009,18:28)
 
Quote (Daniel Smith @ April 11 2009,20:40)
Every single person who espouses ID, has already accepted the possibility of an entity capable of producing life on this planet.  We who have done so, can infer means, motives and causal histories for that designer - you cannot.

so why are you afraid of the questions you've been asked?

where is your evidence?

Which questions are you talking about?

If it's questions about "teh flud" or child molestation, I think your answer is self-evident.

the flood would be a question that you've continued to dodge.  

you've been asked many others as well that you have refused to answer.

why?

  
  1103 replies since Jan. 26 2009,15:45 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]