RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Daniel Smith's "Argument from Impossibility", in which assumptions are facts< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 02 2009,20:42   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ Mar. 02 2009,19:23)
Now, you'll notice that the author doesn't state that an enzyme cannot be modified to do other things.  I also never said that, nor does my argument imply it.

Daniel, if you bothered to read those papers I linked to earlier, you would understand that you don't need to "modify" enzymes. Many of them can "do other things" anyway.

Your capacity to miss the point remains astonishing. Nearly as astonishing as your ignorance about biochemistry.

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
  1103 replies since Jan. 26 2009,15:45 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]