RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Daniel Smith's "Argument from Impossibility", in which assumptions are facts< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Daniel Smith



Posts: 970
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 01 2009,16:23   

Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Feb. 26 2009,18:13)
   
Quote (Daniel Smith @ Feb. 26 2009,19:46)
This book was published in 1982.  How well does recent evidence fit?  It seems to me that there is mounting evidence against the "explanatory framework of the Darwinian theory".

I've already predicted several times that - as evidence mounts - gradualistic mechanisms will fall by the wayside.

We'll see...

Heh.

Half your argument is based on personal experiences and theological longings - good luck with that - and half on obsolete science and idiosyncratic seemings.

I think we should wrap this up.

Are you conceding then that no current biological system can be explained by the "sheer accumulation of micro-mutations"?

By your 'snippage' and lack of response to that question, I'm thinking you already know you've lost that argument.

--------------
"If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true is really true, there would be little hope of advance."  Orville Wright

"The presence or absence of a creative super-intelligence is unequivocally a scientific question."  Richard Dawkins

  
  1103 replies since Jan. 26 2009,15:45 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]