RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Daniel Smith's "Argument from Impossibility", in which assumptions are facts< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 25 2009,03:25   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ Feb. 25 2009,01:07)
Quote (Louis @ Feb. 24 2009,02:13)
Here we go 'round the mulberry bush,
The mulberry bush, the mulberry bush.
Here we go 'round the mulberry bush,
So early in the morning.

[snip]

Louis

Congratulations Louis!

You've just joined oldman on my Troll list.

It's quite obvious that you just want to harass me and that no civil or productive discussion can be had with you.

I'll be skipping all your posts too now.

All very nice, but you need to prove you are not a child molester. I claim that it is impossible for you to prove you are not a child molester, it's up to you to prove that wrong, like you I don't need to provide details.

BTW your whining doesn't constitute some species of moral high ground. It's abundantly obvious what you are and I am happy tp point it out.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
  1103 replies since Jan. 26 2009,15:45 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]