RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Daniel Smith's "Argument from Impossibility", in which assumptions are facts< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2009,19:56   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ Feb. 24 2009,19:52)
The reason I'm here is twofold:

1.  To put my ideas to the test.  To throw them out there and see if they are successfully shot down or if they stand the test.


Well, that didn't go so well for them by any objective measure. "Down in flames" is an expression that comes to mind.







   
Quote (Daniel Smith @ Feb. 24 2009,19:52)
2.  To challenge those who think science verifies their lack of belief in God and hopefully convince one or two that it doesn't.


Still waiting for you to pose any sort of challenge at all. Wake us up when you get around to that part.

Edited by Lou FCD on Feb. 24 2009,20:59

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
  1103 replies since Jan. 26 2009,15:45 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]