Louis
Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
| Quote (dheddle @ Jan. 25 2011,19:42) | | Quote (MadPanda @ FCD,Jan. 25 2011,13:33) | | Quote (dheddle @ Jan. 25 2011,13:25) | Nice try (not really) but alas there is no Calvinism in my post. Being saved by faith in the finished work of Christ is a doctrine shared by the majority of Christians. Calvinists, non-Calvinists, Protestants, and Catholics.
That's about the third time you used "heddle is a Calvinist" as a blunt instrument. If you want a piece of advice--wait until I actually make an argument from Calvinism before you use it as an argument stopper. |
Sorry, heddle, but mercy is for the merciful. Your opinion on these matters is well known, as is your affiliation. And since, in my opinion, your opinions on these matters come from your particular denomination's interpretation, I will continue to refer to this fact.
If you feel I have misrepresented or misquoted you, of course, I would expect you to point it out...but let there be no misunderstanding--you are a Calvinist, as you have said so yourself many times. It is hardly unfair of me to refer to you as such.
Since nobody is forcing you to read my posts, nor to respond to them, you might as well simply ignore them. It isn't as though I have any plans of trying to change your mind.
The MadPanda, FCD |
No you haven't misquoted me or insulted me or anything of that nature. Nor have you been unfair, per se. What you did was argue ad hominem. "Heddle is a Calvinist" is not relevant when the point I am making has nothing to do with Calvinism. For example, we can ask FtK (whom I do not believe is a Calvinist) if she agrees with my working definition of Christianity--that salvation comes from having faith in the work of Christ to atone for your sins. For crying out loud, you could ask Wes. Actually you could ask anyone who has studied Christianity for more than 15 minutes. |
That includes me then. Can we not but say we did?
Louis
--------------
Bye.
|
