RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (7) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Comparing Dembski and Mike Gene, Story of two attempts to infer design< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
swbarnes2



Posts: 78
Joined: Mar. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 24 2008,19:46   

Quote
You've made it quite clear you understand neither SR, GR, or QM.


But, but, but, how could anyone who struggled through a 1000 page book not know more than professionals?  It was a thousand pages!  Sure, getting a PhD in physics means that you know more that someone who only read a 400 page book, but spending 5 years of your life training to learn the math, and how to apply it correctly, and living hip-deep in the latest in experimental data doesn't give you half the expertice as someone who struggled through a thousand page book!

And how could Penrose be wrong about...anything?  He wrote a 1000 page book!

  
  204 replies since Jan. 04 2008,22:07 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (7) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]