Richardthughes
Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
Bonus (Joe) Tard:
http://telicthoughts.com/blind-c....-265841
| Quote | Good day to you, sir. What orthodox evolutionary framework would that be? This finding fits neatly within baraminology, which is an evolutionary framework. It also fits in neatly with front loaded evolution. So could you please clarify what you are saying?
Also there isn't anything in the theory of evolution that states take two isoate populations, have random effects cause different damage to the same body part, mate the two populations and have that once damaged body part rgain its original functin.
So please, sir, explain yor comment.
Comment by ID guy — March 2, 2011 @ 11:15 am |
Hmmm. Aborigines and Eskimos can't have babies then.
Please, sir, explain why you are so stupid. DO IT STANDING UP!
--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine
|
