oldmanintheskydidntdoit
Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006
|
| Quote (VMartin @ Nov. 25 2007,03:14) | Erasmus
Obviously you have no arguments. The whole neodarwinian teaching about insects' aposematism is as unsubstantiated as neodarwinism itself.
You got angry because you see that "small survival advantage" and "natural selection" gibberish is a nonsense par excellence in the case.
Perhaps you could give us some explanation of the forces hindering non-controlled proliferation of wasps. If birds and other predators are so afraid of them as you suppose (except a small fraction as you has admitted dialectically - "yes, some birds eat some wasps sometimes".).
Maybe there isn't enough food for them or there are limited amount of insect that wasps oviposit in at meadows and forests? Maybe you have something better.
Never mind if your fantasy isn't good enough to invent some explanation of it. You can preach neodawinian eternal truth at other more friendly threads. Somewhere where nobody doubts about efficency of your beloved "small survival advantages". |
VMartin,
There are some threads at the moment over at http://www.uncommondescent.com/ that could really use your input.
--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings
|
