RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (13) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Coloration of animals, mimicry, aposematism, Is really natural selection behind it?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 04 2007,14:50   

Quote (Assassinator @ Nov. 04 2007,13:31)
I'm sorry Martin i don't really see what you're trying to prove here. I don't think you're trying to disprove natural selection, because it's easely viewed in daily life, but i think you're trying to disprove that natural selection is leading to new species. Am i right?

For those of you who haven't watched VM's evasions, here's the lowdown:

a) he hates Darwinism and thinks that Darwinists are as bad as Stalinists,

b) he doesn't think natural selection exists, and cites various German authors of the 1920's and 1930's to back this up. His science reading seems to taper off around 1940,

c) he appears to have no training in biology or science in any form,

d) he claims to have NO clue as to what does cause variation in nature, but he's very adamant that natural selection is NOT responsible for any of it,

e) he refuses to say whether he believes in heredity,

f) he refuses to say whether he believes in common descent between humans and apes.

g) he can't remember the difference between 'arise' and 'arouse', and he thinks 'stupido' is a word,

h) he thinks we're supposed to be very ashamed and impressed by all this.

There. Now you understand VMartin.

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
  365 replies since Sep. 21 2007,11:31 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (13) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]