RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (58) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Evolution of the horse; a problem for Darwinism?, For Daniel Smith to present his argument< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
mitschlag



Posts: 236
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2008,06:52   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ Feb. 18 2008,19:37)
What do you think of this?        
Quote
TE-induced and other gross chromosome rearrangements can lead to postzygotic isolating mechanisms that result in almost total cross-fertilization barriers between different lines of the same species in experimental organisms in a relatively short time period, as, for instance, in Pisum sativum (71).
CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENTS AND TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS, Wolf-Ekkehard Lonnig and Heinz Saedler (my emphasis)


The footnote for 71 points to the following (unfortunately) German paper:
Lamprecht H. 1974. Monographie der Gattung Pisum. Graz: Steierm¨ark. Landesdruck. 655 pp.

Haven't read the paper yet, but the reference is probably moot.  Such a mechanism for speciation looks perfectly reasonable to my relatively inexpert understanding of such matters.

--------------
"You can establish any “rule” you like if you start with the rule and then interpret the evidence accordingly." - George Gaylord Simpson (1902-1984)

  
  1733 replies since Sep. 18 2007,15:27 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (58) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]