Richard Simons
Posts: 425
Joined: Oct. 2006
|
| Quote (Albatrossity2 @ Oct. 25 2007,06:01) | | Quote (Richard Simons @ Oct. 25 2007,00:00) | | I'm looking forward to your answers. |
I'm not.
It's already clear that the conclusion is more important than the data. Merely looking for an alternative path to the conclusion is a sure sign that the conclusion is hardwired in Daniel's psyche. Unless he shows signs of looking at the evidence and then forming a conclusion, his next post will be just as unsatisfactory as the rest of them have been. |
Perhaps I should have phrased it more carefully. I would like to see answers but I think the questions are mostly unanswerable. I expect that either they will be ignored or there will be a lot of beating of bushes that fails to provide answers. I have noticed (but I have not followed everything in detail) that he seems to be following the usual Creationist/ID tactic of scouring the literature for something that could superficially be seen to support his views and pouncing on it, rather than looking at the evidence as a whole and seeing where it leads.
--------------
All sweeping statements are wrong.
|
