RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (58) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Evolution of the horse; a problem for Darwinism?, For Daniel Smith to present his argument< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 18 2007,08:54   

Quote (Richard Simons @ Oct. 18 2007,08:35)
Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Oct. 18 2007,06:40)

E.G I designed a car so I could get around quickly.
I designed a phone so I can stay in touch.
I designed my home so I can live nice.

That's only partly true. After they were designed, someone had to build them.

Who did (does?) the Great Designer co-opt to do the building, and how did they do it?

Thinking about it more, I suppose the Designer sounds better than the Fabricator.

(edited to correct grammar)

Ah, interesting.

Did the designer implement his own designs or did it sub-contract them out?

ID is getting more like Hitchhikers every day :)

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
  1733 replies since Sep. 18 2007,15:27 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (58) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]