RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (58) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Evolution of the horse; a problem for Darwinism?, For Daniel Smith to present his argument< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
JAM



Posts: 517
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 14 2007,10:53   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ Oct. 14 2007,10:20)
[EDIT]
Speaking of predictions, I have another one for you:
It's my hypothesis that random mutations are only neutral or deleterious - never advantageous.  All advantageous mutations are non-random and are therefore experimentally repeatable and will occurr too rapidly to be random.
Therefore, I predict that anytime Acromobacter guttatus Sp. K172 is subjected to an environment where it must consume nylon to survive, the same frame shift will occur, resulting in Flavobacterium Sp. KI72.

Better?

Better, but you still need numbers. Specifically, "rapidly" is not meaningful, because mutation rates are calculated per individual per generation.

What does your hypothesis predict if a different bacterial species is selected on nylon?

1) Will multiple selections give the same result, and/or
2) Will the enzymes that evolved be the orthologs of the ones that evolved in Achromobacter?

P.S. Did you check out the mouse vs. rat sequences yet?

  
  1733 replies since Sep. 18 2007,15:27 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (58) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]