RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (58) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Evolution of the horse; a problem for Darwinism?, For Daniel Smith to present his argument< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Daniel Smith



Posts: 970
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2007,23:01   

Quote (jeannot @ Oct. 13 2007,15:16)
So what about the fact that mutation rates are far higher at synonymous sites?

As I understand it (and I just learned this) synonymous sites are sites that will accept a substitution with no functional change.  Therefore, there's no reason that these sites wouldn't show higher mutation rates.  The question is: why do sites that are supposedly non-functional show more constraint than synonymous sites?

--------------
"If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true is really true, there would be little hope of advance."  Orville Wright

"The presence or absence of a creative super-intelligence is unequivocally a scientific question."  Richard Dawkins

  
  1733 replies since Sep. 18 2007,15:27 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (58) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]