RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (21) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Challenge to Evolutionists< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 19 2007,08:40   

Quote (supersport @ Sep. 19 2007,08:38)
Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Sep. 19 2007,08:37)
Lamarckian ideas of inheritance fell out of favor not just because of experiments, but because Mendelian genetics provided a better explanation of the phenomena of interest. When one mechanism displaces another on grounds of explanatory power, the consensus view shifts not so much because "disproof" of the older view is offered, but because the older view lacks properties that the new one provides.

"falling out of favor" is not science....it's opinion and guesswork.

you've proven you know nothing about science, cubicle boy.

About those toxic-waste eating bacteria that still ain't dead...

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
  603 replies since Sep. 17 2007,22:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (21) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]